Get the Newsletter
Subscribe to the In All Things newsletter to receive biweekly updates with the latest content.
How might the practice of paying attention to and naming the good in our lives direct our hearts toward hope?
The pastor of the church I called home in Los Angeles talked about the Lord鈥檚 Prayer like a kedge anchor. We may first think of an anchor as holding something in place, and certainly we can consider the Lord鈥檚 Prayer in this way: a tether for our hearts and minds to the model offered by Jesus. Yet, the purpose of a kedge anchor is to move a water vessel along when it has run aground or needs hauling due to engine failure or lack of helpful wind or current. This type of anchor is carried by a small boat in the direction the ship needs to go and is dropped there; then, the chain is reeled in to draw the ship toward the anchor. Little by little, the ship can make its progress in this way. When words fail us, when we feel abandoned, afraid, stuck, or nothing at all, when the resistance is overwhelming, we can rely on these words to draw us toward God. This prayer can move our hearts when our hearts are not moved to prayer.
This metaphor has been on my mind since attending a performance of Every Brilliant Thing in New York City, a 鈥渕ostly-one-person show鈥 starring Daniel Radcliffe (of Harry Potter fame, though he鈥檚 had a robust Broadway career since). That same week, I was reading Dr. Justin Ariel Bailey鈥檚 latest book, , which is very much about prayer and its formational effect on our imaginations. I鈥檓 thinking about the importance of remembering and naming the 鈥渂rilliant things鈥 in life; these can be a sort of kedge anchor, too, as they direct our attention toward hope. And, it matters that we hope in community; at times we will need others to set the anchor for us.
My experience at the theatre that day has set itself among my life鈥檚 own collection of brilliant things. The play serves up just what it claims our hearts need: to notice and name the good; to let others name those good things for us; to speak them out when others cannot. To put ourselves in contact with foretastes of heaven, however simple or small they may be. As a total experience, this production conjures an ultimately joyous spell that has the audience at times quite literally singing and dancing, high-fiving and hugging, playing together, declaring out loud a host of small beauties that glimmer within this life鈥 quite an accomplishment for a story about depression.
The list of 鈥渂rilliant things鈥 began for the play鈥檚 narrator (in this case named Daniel) when he was a young boy. He hoped that, if he could give his mother enough reasons to stay alive, she might get better. So he began writing down 鈥渆very brilliant thing about the world, everything worth living for.鈥 Daniel calls out, 鈥淥ne!鈥 and someone from among the audience responds: 鈥淚ce cream!鈥 鈥淭wo!鈥 and from elsewhere in the theatre: 鈥淲ater fights!鈥 On cue, additional delights of a 7-year-old ring out: staying up past your bedtime to watch TV, the color yellow, things with stripes, rollercoasters. The ever-growing list becomes a thread through the narrator鈥檚 life story as he tells us about loss, love, depression, rupture, and repair.
Though the designated and swiftly prepped participants are a small percentage, the total audience seems aware from the beginning that we have a role in this event. We are not distanced observers of an entertainer; we have entered a shared space of play with someone who views each one of us as a friend. We lean in, agreeing, 鈥測es, let鈥檚 play; this will be fun.鈥 Together, in this theatre, we are rehearsing a way of moving through the world and of being in community: noticing, remembering, mourning, sharing, reaching for each other, delighting, sighing, hoping.
If you think you might have the pleasure of experiencing this play, you may want to skip the next four paragraphs. But I wish to help you, reader, understand the particularly life-affirming nature of this kind of theatre, which I shall attempt to do by describing in detail the first scene involving significant audience participation.
I鈥檓 thinking about the importance of remembering and naming the 鈥渂rilliant things鈥 in life; these can be a sort of kedge anchor, too, as they direct our attention toward hope.
The first scene played for us portrays a heart-breaking childhood experience: the death of a beloved pet. In this case, the family dog, represented by an audience member鈥檚 coat, is draped in Daniel鈥檚 arms. Daniel beckons a nearby audience member to represent the veterinarian. Her task is this: give the dog an injection in the thigh that will allow the suffering animal to painlessly drift off. A pen is borrowed to serve as the syringe. Our veterinarian approaches slowly, almost reverently, gaze fixed on the dog. She then pauses, looks Daniel in the eyes, and, at the height of the scene鈥檚 intensity, asks, 鈥渨here is his head?鈥
She does not say this to be funny. She earnestly wishes to succeed with what she鈥檚 been asked to do. At any other performance, the participant might simply make a choice about which part of the coat is the dog鈥檚 leg and commit to the action. In this case, however, our vet is suddenly recast as impossibly incompetent, much to our delight. We connect deeply with her insecurity; we were all wondering the same. It is an exquisite blend of the carefully structured and the totally improvised, and the scene is unique yet successful in each performance as a result. Daniel himself is a little surprised and must negotiate participants鈥 choices moment to moment and case by case. The inherent risk increases the sense of play, the aliveness, the preciousness that this is ours and only ours, both for him and for us.
What happens next? Daniel first looks at her like a shocked and offended little boy. He does not speak, but we see this brief reaction register fully yet subtly: the grown-up does not know. He deftly slips from 鈥渓ittle boy Daniel鈥 to narrator-coach, indicates where she ought to make the injection, and snaps right back into character. Our veterinarian now approaches the coat-dog in one bold step and stabs with the swift force of a dramatically heroic TV-show Epi-Pen injection. Again, we are in stitches of laughter. Again, Daniel is both fully surprised by the choice she has made, and masterfully managing those choices, to our great delight.
Mere seconds later, tears are welling in our eyes as Daniel describes these final seconds of his best friend鈥檚 life and how it feels to hold his body as he dies. A brief pause, we wipe tears, and suddenly the coat is nothing but a coat, promptly returned to its owner.
The entire show is a swift-moving current of emotions, pressing the edges of our capacity to feel it all in turn: joy, grief, delight, the bitterest and sweetest of our own memories echoing within the narrator鈥檚 deeply personal and vulnerable story. All pretend, all come and gone in seconds, all truly felt but never over-indulged. And off we go to the next chapter of the story. This itself is a lesson: feel it, but don鈥檛 linger there. Let yourself be carried onward.
Later, Daniel remarks: 鈥淭he younger me had dealt with this so much better. He wasn鈥檛 self-righteous. The younger me was hopeful. Naive, of course. But hopeful.鈥 This naive hope becomes a handhold for the narrator within his own depression. Prompted by a seed quietly planted by someone in his life, and late-discovered, he has the momentary courage to do something childish: he calls for help. And a helper, by the grace of God, is there to respond in simple compassion, reminding him who he really is.
鈥淚鈥檓 not sure I can ever allow myself to be joyful. I鈥檓 just not very good at it. It鈥檚 helpful to know there are other people who feel the same.鈥 And, in this play, it proves helpful to be buoyed by others reminding us: this isn鈥檛 the whole story. The brilliant things are arrows pointing to the 鈥渕ore鈥 鈥 and when we can鈥檛 see them ourselves, may the Spirit move someone nearby to show them to us, to help us imagine more than we can see right now, help us remember to hope, and hope on our behalf.
It warrants mentioning that this play is not attempting to offer a simplistic prescription of self-help positivity. On the contrary, a big part of this story is that despite his persistent efforts, a long list of brilliant things did not change the outcome for his mother. In treating the topics of depression and suicide, the script takes great care to not perpetuate harmful narratives and directly addresses the Werther Effect: research demonstrates that 鈥渟uicide is contagious,鈥 especially through how it鈥檚 talked about in media. The play accepts, and grieves, the sorrowful mystery that some end their lives for reasons unknowable in our time.
鈥淏ecause there鈥檚 only so much anyone can know.鈥
鈥淲丑测?鈥
鈥淏ecause if you were able to know everything then life would be unlivable.鈥
鈥淲丑测?鈥
鈥淏ecause then there would be no mystery, no curiosity, no creativity, no conversation, no discovery. Nothing would be new and we鈥檇 have no need to use our imaginations and our imaginations are what make life bearable.鈥
鈥淲丑测?鈥
鈥淏ecause in order to live in the present we have to be able to imagine a future that will be better than the past.鈥
鈥淲丑测?鈥
鈥淏ecause that鈥檚 what hope is and without hope we couldn鈥檛 go on.鈥
In trying to help his mother by childish, naive means, in a roundabout and unpredictable way, the narrator himself is helped in his adulthood. The ongoing task he required of himself for someone else鈥檚 sake 鈥 looking to notice, paying attention 鈥 slowly changed his way of seeing the world. And, the vulnerability of sharing the list 鈥 something he never intended to do 鈥 allowed it to become something bigger than he could create, added to and shaped by others. And then, it returned to him in his need. God, in your grace, keep us childish. The kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.
...and when we can鈥檛 see them ourselves, may the Spirit move someone nearby to show them to us, to help us imagine more than we can see right now, help us remember to hope, and hope on our behalf.
鈥淚f you live a long life and get to the end of it without ever once having felt crushingly depressed, then you probably haven鈥檛 been paying attention,鈥 says the narrator in the final minutes. He has feared that his fate may one day be the same as his mother鈥檚. Paying attention will hurt. Paying attention can heal.
We can sensitize ourselves to wonder, and living within community helps us sense it when we cannot on our own. We are carried within a bigger, wider story. In our daily living, we will lose sight, forget, perhaps even not want to hear it, and we need all the more to be told again and again.
I鈥檓 reminded of Mary Oliver鈥檚 poem 鈥淪ometimes鈥, in which she writes:
鈥淚nstructions for living a life:
Pay attention.
Be astonished.
Tell about it.鈥
Together, we can cultivate an attitude of wonder, of beholding what is there, signaling the More. Renew our vision, Lord. Help us to be astonished and delighted, like children, by the foretastes of your Great Promise. Help us to reach for one another and, in so doing, find You.
In birdsong.
In grass suddenly greening.
Ants dutifully carrying a cookie crumb.
That song we sang over and over again on a roadtrip.
A baby fussing in the pew behind us.
The swirl of milk poured into a cup of coffee.
The breaking of bread.
In life.
In death.
You.
Subscribe to the In All Things newsletter to receive biweekly updates with the latest content.
We spend much of our lives waiting for the "right" timing and circumstances, only to overlook the significance already present where we are. What might we be missing by assuming meaning only appears in ideal conditions?
How can we balance the demands of life with the delight, spontaneity, and exploration that sustain and restore?